Search for: "Anthony Teague"
Results 1 - 13
of 13
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2010, 4:22 pm
Coast Guards in connection with the wrongful death of an 8-year old Rancho Penasquitos boy, Anthony DeWeese, during the annual holiday Parade of Lights held in San Diego Bay. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 7:25 am
., dissented, joined by Justice Anthony M. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 8:36 am
., dissented, joined by Justice Anthony M. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 8:41 am
., dissented, joined by Justice Anthony M. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 7:26 am
Teague’s case is not part of the Article 32 hearing. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 8:56 am
Or as Justice Thomas put it, in closing his dissent, under this (mistaken, he believes) application of Teague, “every end is instead a new beginning,” Still, Justice Anthony Kennedy’s opinion for the Court seems relatively straightforward, as it did to seven of the eight Justices – including Justice Samuel Alito, the lone dissenter in Johnson. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 5:11 am
Despite its announcement twenty-seven years ago, the application of Teague’s retroactivity doctrine has continued to trouble the Court. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 8:53 am
“You’re now creating a regime,” Justice Anthony M. [read post]
3 Mar 2007, 4:06 pm
He explained that under Teague v. [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 9:26 am
Justice Anthony M. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm
(Not to be outdone, we offer our own highly analytical prediction about the likely votes of the Chief Justice and Anthony Kennedy.) [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:55 am
” Justice Anthony Kennedy similarly concurred only in the judgment, agreeing in one paragraph with Justice Alito that the statute is not unconstitutionally vague and with Justice Thomas that under the residual clause as written, a conviction for possession of a short-barreled shotgun does not qualify as a “violent felony. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 8:35 am
Intricate discussions of retroactivity doctrine and federalism, habeas corpus, and finality, have proven attractive to some of the Justices in the past in cases such as Teague v. [read post]
